​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

What is Dollar General Corporation and where is it located?

Dollar General (NYSE: DG) has been delivering value to shoppers for more than 80 years through its mission of Serving Others. Dollar General helps shoppers Save time. Save money. Every day!® by offering products that are frequently used and replenished, such as food, snacks, health and beauty aids, cleaning supplies, basic apparel, housewares and seasonal items at everyday low prices in convenient neighborhood locations. Dollar General operated 16,368 stores in 45 states as of February 28, 2020. Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072.

We refer to our company as “we,” “us” or “Dollar General.” Unless otherwise noted or required by context, “2020,” “2019,” “2018” and “2017” refer to our fiscal years ending or ended January 29, 2021, January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019, and February 2, 2018, respectively.

What is a proxy, who is asking for it, and who is paying for the cost to solicit it?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person, called a “proxy,” to vote your stock. The document designating someone as a proxy is also called a proxy or a proxy card.

Our directors, officers and employees are soliciting your proxy on behalf of our Board of Directors and will not be specially paid for doing so. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, email and other electronic means, advertisements, personal solicitation, news releases issued by Dollar General, postings on our website, or otherwise. Dollar General will pay all expenses of this solicitation.

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

You may vote if you owned shares of Dollar General common stock at the close of business on March 19, 2020 (the “Record Date”). As of that date, there were 251,515,048 shares of Dollar General common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter.

What am I voting on?

You will be asked to vote on:

•

the election of the 9 nominees listed in this proxy statement;

​

•

the approval on an advisory basis of our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement;

​

•

the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent auditor”) for 2020;

​

•

the approval of amendments to our amended and restated charter, as amended (our “Charter”), to replace supermajority voting requirements with a majority vote requirement as described in this proxy statement; and

​

•

the approval of an amendment to our amended and restated bylaws (our “Bylaws”) to replace the supermajority voting requirement with a majority vote requirement as described in this proxy statement.

​

We are unaware of other matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting. Under Tennessee law and our governing documents, no other non-procedural business may be raised at the meeting unless proper notice has been given to shareholders.

How many votes must be present to hold the annual meeting?

A quorum, consisting of the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date, must exist to conduct business at the annual meeting. If a quorum is not present, the presiding officer at the meeting may adjourn the meeting from time to time until a quorum is present.

How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your proxy over the telephone or Internet or, if you received printed proxy materials, by marking, signing, dating and returning the printed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. Please refer to the instructions on the Notice

​

​

of Internet Availability or proxy card, as applicable. Alternatively, you may vote in person at the annual meeting.

If you are a street name holder, your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee will provide materials and instructions for voting your shares. You may vote in person at the meeting if you obtain and bring to the meeting a legal proxy from your broker, banker, trustee or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares.

In either case, shareholders wishing to attend the meeting must follow the procedures described below under “Who may attend the annual meeting.”

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

You are a “shareholder of record” if your shares are registered directly in your name with EQ Shareowner Services, our transfer agent. You are a “street name” holder if your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee as custodian.

What if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card?

You will receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability or proxy cards if you hold shares in different ways (e.g., joint tenancy, trusts, custodial accounts, etc.) or in multiple accounts. Street name holders will receive the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card or other voting information, along with voting instructions, from their brokers. Please vote the shares represented by each Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card you receive to ensure that all your shares are voted.

How will my proxy be voted?

The persons named on the proxy card will vote your proxy as you direct. If you return a signed proxy card or complete the Internet or telephone voting procedures but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, the persons named on the proxy card will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors. If business other than that described in this proxy statement is properly raised, your proxies have authority to vote as they think best, including to adjourn the meeting.

Can I change my mind and revoke my proxy?

Yes. A shareholder of record may revoke a proxy given pursuant to this solicitation by:

•

signing a valid, later-dated proxy card and submitting it so that it is received before the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions included in the proxy card;

​

•

at or before the annual meeting, submitting to our Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation dated later than the date of the proxy;

​

•

submitting a later-dated vote by telephone or Internet no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on May 26, 2020; or

​

•

attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

​

Note that attendance at the annual meeting, by itself, will not revoke your proxy.

A street name holder may revoke a proxy given pursuant to this solicitation by following the instructions of the bank, broker, trustee or other nominee who holds his or her shares.

How many votes are needed to elect directors?

To be elected at the annual meeting, a nominee must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by holders of shares entitled to vote at the meeting. Under our Charter, the “affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast” means that the number of votes cast in favor of a nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast against his or her election. You may vote in favor of or against the election of each nominee, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares.

What happens if a director fails to receive the required vote for election?

An incumbent director who does not receive the required vote for election at the annual meeting must promptly tender a resignation as a director for consideration by our Board of Directors pursuant to our Board-approved director resignation policy. Each director standing for election at the annual meeting has agreed to resign, effective upon the Board’s acceptance of such resignation, if he or she does not receive a majority vote. If the Board rejects the offered resignation, the director will continue to serve until the next annual shareholders’ meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected or his or her earlier resignation or removal in accordance with our Bylaws. If the Board accepts the offered resignation, the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill the resulting vacancy or decrease the Board’s size.

How many votes are needed to approve other matters?

The proposal to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers and the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent auditor for 2020 will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the applicable proposal exceed the votes cast against it. The vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory and, therefore, not binding on Dollar General, our Board of Directors, or its Compensation Committee.

​

​

Each of the proposals to approve the amendments to our Charter and to our Bylaws, in each case to replace supermajority voting provisions with majority voting provisions as described in this proxy statement, will be approved if the applicable proposal receives affirmative votes from the holders of at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Dollar General entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.

With respect to each of these proposals, and any other matter properly brought before the annual meeting, you may vote in favor of or against the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares.

How will abstentions and broker non-votes be treated?

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but will not be counted as votes cast either in favor of or against a particular proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of proposals 1, 2 or 3, but will have the effect of votes against proposals 4 and 5.

What are broker non-votes?

Although your broker is the record holder of any shares that you hold in street name, it must vote those shares pursuant to your instructions. If you do not provide instructions, your broker may exercise discretionary voting power over your shares for “routine” items but not for “non-routine” items. All matters described in this proxy statement, except for the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditor, are considered to be non-routine matters.

“Broker non-votes” occur when shares held of record by a broker are not voted on a matter because the beneficial owner has not provided voting instructions and the broker either lacks or declines to exercise the authority to vote the shares in its discretion.

Who may attend the annual meeting?

Only shareholders as of the Record Date, their proxy holders and our invited guests may attend the annual meeting. To be admitted to the annual meeting, you must present a government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, state-issued ID card, or passport, and proof of share ownership as of the Record Date. To prove ownership, shareholders of record will be verified against our list of registered shareholders, while beneficial shareholders must present an account statement showing the share

ownership as of the Record Date; a copy of the voting instruction form provided by, or a valid legal proxy from, the broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding the shares; a letter from a broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding the shares confirming the beneficial owner’s ownership as of the Record Date; or other similar evidence of ownership. We reserve the right to deny admittance to anyone who does not comply with these requirements.

We will decide in our sole discretion whether your documentation meets the admission requirements. If you hold shares in a joint account, both owners can be admitted to the meeting if proof of joint ownership is provided and you both provide identification.

Where can I find directions to the annual meeting?

Directions to Goodlettsville City Hall, where we will hold the annual meeting, are posted on the “Investor Information” section of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com.

Will the annual meeting be webcast?

Yes. You may visit the “News and Events—Events and Presentations” section of the “Investor Information” page of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 27, 2020 to access the live webcast of the annual meeting. An archived copy of the webcast will be available on our website for at least 60 days. The information on our website, however, is not incorporated by reference into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement.

What happens if a change to the annual meeting is necessary due to exigent circumstances?

We are sensitive to public health and travel concerns related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and accordingly may announce alternative arrangements for the annual meeting, including holding the annual meeting solely by means of remote communication. If we take this step, we will announce the change(s) in advance, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website (investor.dollargeneral.com) and filed with the SEC as additional proxy materials. A meeting held solely by means of remote communication will have no impact on shareholders’ ability to provide their proxy by using the internet or telephone or by completing, signing, dating and mailing their proxy card, each as explained in this proxy statement. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.

​

​

What is the structure of the Board of Directors?

Our Board of Directors must consist of 1 to 15 directors, with the exact number set by the Board. The Board size is currently fixed at 9 . All directors are elected annually by our shareholders.

How are directors identified and nominated?

The Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending director candidates, including the slate to be presented to shareholders for election at the annual meeting, to our Board of Directors, which makes the ultimate election or nomination determination, as applicable. The Nominating Committee may use a variety of methods to identify potential director candidates, such as recommendations by our directors, management, shareholders or third-party search firms (see “Can shareholders recommend or nominate directors?” below). The Nominating Committee has retained a third-party search firm to assist in identifying potential Board candidates who meet our qualification and

experience requirements and, for any such candidate identified by such search firm, to compile and evaluate information regarding the candidate’s qualifications, experience, and potential conflicts of interest, and to verify the candidate’s education. Ms.  Debra Sandler , a nominee for election at the annual meeting, was identified as a candidate by the third party search firm.

Does the Board consider diversity when identifying director nominees?

Yes. We have a written policy to endeavor to achieve a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience in areas that are relevant to our business. To implement this policy, the Nominating Committee considers each candidate’s individual qualifications in the context of how that candidate would relate to the Board as a whole and is intentional about including in the candidate pool persons with diverse attributes such as gender, race and age. The Committee periodically assesses this policy’s effectiveness as part of its annual self-evaluation. The matrix included below illustrates the diverse experience and composition of our Board .

​

How are nominees evaluated; what are the threshold qualifications?

The Nominating Committee is charged with recommending to our Board of Directors only those candidates that it believes are qualified to serve as Board members consistent with the director selection criteria established by the Board and who have not reached the age of 76, unless the Board has approved an exception to this limit on a case by case basis. If a waiver is granted, it will be reviewed annually.

The Nominating Committee assesses a candidate’s independence, background, experience, and time commitments, as well as our Board’s skill needs. With respect to incumbent directors, the Committee also assesses the meeting attendance record and suitability for continued service. The Committee determines that each nominee is in a position to devote adequate time to the effective performance of director duties and possesses the following threshold characteristics: integrity and accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, a cooperative approach, a record of achievement, loyalty, and the ability to consult with and advise management. The Committee recommends candidates, including those submitted by shareholders, only if it believes a candidate’s knowledge, experience and expertise would strengthen the Board and that the candidate is committed to representing our shareholders’ long-term interests.

Who are the nominees this year?

All nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting, consisting of the 8 incumbent directors who were elected at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders and Ms. Sandler who was appointed to our Board effective April 1, 2020, were nominated by the Board of Directors for election by shareholders at the annual meeting upon the recommendation of the Nominating Committee. Our Board believes that each of the nominees can devote an adequate amount of time to the effective performance of director duties and possesses all of the threshold qualifications identified above.

If elected, each nominee would hold office until the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to any earlier resignation or removal.

The following lists the nominees, their ages at the date of this proxy statement and the calendar year in which they first became a director, along with their biographies and the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that each nominee should serve as a director of Dollar General.

​

​

​

Can shareholders recommend or nominate directors?

Yes. Shareholders may recommend candidates to our Nominating Committee by providing the same information within the same deadlines required for nominating candidates pursuant to the advance notice provisions in our Bylaws. Our Nominating Committee is required to consider such candidates and to apply the same evaluation criteria to them as it applies to other director candidates. Shareholders also can go a step further and nominate directors for election by shareholders by following the advance notice procedures in our Bylaws.

Whether recommending a candidate for our Nominating Committee’s consideration or nominating a director for election by shareholders, you must submit a written notice for receipt by our Corporate Secretary at the address and within the deadlines disclosed under “Shareholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting.” The notice must contain all information required by our Bylaws about the shareholder proposing the nominee and about the nominee.

We also have a “proxy access” provision in our Bylaws which allows eligible shareholders to nominate candidates for election to our Board and include such candidates in our proxy statement and ballot subject to the terms, conditions, procedures and deadlines set forth in Article I, Section 12 of our Bylaws. Our proxy

access bylaw provides that holders of at least 3% of our outstanding shares, held by up to 20 shareholders, holding the shares continuously for at least 3 years, can nominate up to 20% of our Board for election at an annual shareholders’ meeting.

For more specific information regarding these deadlines in respect of the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, see “Shareholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting” below. You should consult our Bylaws, posted on the “Investor Information—Corporate Governance” section of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com, for more detailed information regarding the processes summarized above. No shareholder nominees have been submitted for this year’s annual meeting.

What if a nominee is unwilling or unable to serve?

That is not expected to occur. If it does, the persons designated as proxies on the proxy card are authorized to vote your proxy for a substitute designated by our Board of Directors.

Are there any family relationships between any of the directors, executive officers or nominees?

There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers or nominees.

​

​

Our Board of Directors and its committees have an important role in our risk oversight process. We identify and manage our key risks using our enterprise risk management program. This framework evaluates internal and external business, financial, legal, reputational and other risks, identifies mitigation strategies, and assesses any residual risk. The program employs interviews with various levels of management and our Board and reviews of strategic initiatives, recent or potential legislative or regulatory changes, certain internal metrics and other information. The Audit Committee oversees our enterprise risk management program, reviewing enterprise risk evaluation results at least annually and high residual risk categories, along with their mitigation strategies, quarterly. In addition, as part of its regular review of progress versus the strategic plan, our Board reviews related material risks as appropriate. Our General

Counsel also periodically provides information to the Board regarding our insurance coverage and programs as well as litigation and other legal risks.

In addition to consideration as part of the enterprise risk management program, cybersecurity risk is further evaluated through various internal audits as well as engagements of third parties to perform cybersecurity assessments, benchmark our cybersecurity program, and assess how any identified vulnerabilities in the industry might impact our company and would be prevented and/or detected by of our controls and procedures. Management develops action plans to address select identified opportunities for improvement, and the Audit Committee quarterly reviews metrics pertaining to cybersecurity risks and mitigation.

​

​

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation program. As discussed under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Risk Considerations” below, the Compensation Committee also participates in periodic assessments of the risks relating to our overall compensation programs. In addition, our Nominating Committee reviews detailed information regarding corporate governance trends and practices within our company’s industry as well as across industries to inform governance-related recommendations to the Board. For more information regarding the role of each standing committee, see “What functions are performed by the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees?” below.

The entire Board is regularly informed about risks through the committee reporting process, as well as through special reports and updates from management and advisors. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships. Our Board believes this division of risk management responsibilities effectively addresses the material risks facing Dollar General. Our Board further believes that our leadership structure, described above, supports the risk oversight function of the Board as it allows our independent directors, through the independent Board committees and in executive sessions of independent directors, to exercise effective oversight of management’s actions in identifying risks and implementing effective risk management policies and controls.

Our Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee, each with a Board-adopted written charter available on the “Investor Information—Corporate Governance” section of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com. Current information regarding

these committees is set forth below. In addition to the functions outlined below, each committee performs an annual self-evaluation, periodically reviews and reassesses its charter, and evaluates and makes recommendations concerning shareholder proposals that are within the committee’s expertise.

Does Dollar General have an audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee?

Yes. Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Cochran and Mr. Rhodes is an audit committee financial expert who is independent as defined in NYSE listing standards and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The SEC has determined that designation as an audit committee financial expert will not cause a person to be deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose.

How often did the Board and its committees meet in 2019?

During 2019, our Board, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee

met 5, 5, 6 and 3 times, respectively. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served which were held during the period for which he or she was a director and a member of each applicable committee.

What is Dollar General’s policy regarding Board member attendance at the annual meeting?

Our Board of Directors has adopted a policy that all directors should attend annual shareholders’ meetings unless attendance is not feasible due to unavoidable circumstances. All persons serving as Board members at the time attended the 2019 annual shareholders’ meeting.

​

​

Does Dollar General have a management succession plan?

Yes. Our Board of Directors ensures that a formalized process governs long-term management development and succession. Our Board formally reviews our management succession plan at least annually. Our comprehensive program encompasses not only our CEO and other executive officers but all employees through the front-line supervisory level. The program focuses on key succession elements, including identification of potential successors for positions where it has been determined that internal succession is appropriate, assessment of each potential successor’s level of readiness, and preparation of individual growth and development plans. With respect to CEO succession planning, our long-term business strategy is also considered. In addition, we maintain and review with the Board periodically a confidential procedure for the timely and efficient transfer of the CEO’s responsibilities in the event of an emergency or his sudden incapacitation or departure.

Are there share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and senior officers?

Yes. Details of our share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and senior officers are included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Share Ownership Guidelines and Holding

Requirements” and “Director Compensation” for more information on these guidelines and holding requirements. The Compensation Committee establishes the related administrative details.

How can I communicate with the Board of Directors?

We describe our Board-approved process for security holders and other interested parties to contact the entire Board, a particular director, or the non-management directors or independent directors as a group on www.dollargeneral.com under “Investor Information—Corporate Governance.”

Where can I find more information about Dollar General’s corporate governance practices?

Our governance-related information is posted on www.dollargeneral.com under “Investor Information—Corporate Governance,” including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the charter of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee, and the name(s) of the person(s) chosen to lead the executive sessions of the non-management directors and, if different, of the independent directors. This information is available in print to any shareholder who sends a written request to: Investor Relations, Dollar General Corporation, 100 Mission Ridge, Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072.

​

​

​

Is Dollar General subject to the NYSE governance rules regarding director independence?

Yes. A majority of our directors must satisfy the independence requirements set forth in the NYSE listing standards. All members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee also must be independent to comply with NYSE listing standards and, in the case of the Audit Committee, with SEC rules. The NYSE listing standards define specific relationships that disqualify directors from being independent and further require that the Board affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with Dollar General in order to be considered “independent.” The SEC’s rules and NYSE listing standards contain separate definitions of independence for members of audit committees and compensation committees, respectively.

How does the Board of Directors determine director independence?

The Board of Directors determines the independence of each director and director nominee using guidelines it has adopted, which include all elements of independence in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules as well as certain Board-adopted categorical independence standards. You may find these guidelines within our Corporate Governance Guidelines posted on the “Investor Information—Corporate Governance” section of our website located at www.dollargeneral.com.

The Board first considers whether any director or nominee has a relationship covered by the NYSE listing standards that would prohibit an independence finding for Board or committee purposes. The Board then analyzes any relationship of the remaining eligible directors and nominees with Dollar General or our management that falls outside the parameters of the Board’s separately adopted categorical independence standards to determine if that relationship is material. The Board may determine that a person who has a relationship outside such parameters is nonetheless independent because the relationship is not considered

to be material. Any director who has a material relationship with Dollar General or its management is not considered to be independent. Absent special circumstances, the Board does not consider or analyze any relationship that management has determined falls within the parameters of the Board’s separately adopted categorical independence standards.

Are all of the directors and nominees independent?

Our CEO, Todd J. Vasos, is the only non-independent director. Our Board has affirmatively determined that each of Warren F. Bryant, Michael M. Calbert, Sandra B. Cochran, Patricia D. Fili-Krushel, Timothy I. McGuire, William C. Rhodes, III, Debra A. Sandler, and Ralph E. Santana is independent under both the NYSE listing standards and our additional independence standards. Except as described below, any relationship between an independent director or nominee and Dollar General or our management fell within the Board-adopted categorical standards and, accordingly, was not reviewed or considered by our Board in making independence decisions. There is no person currently serving or who served in 2019 on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee or the Nominating Committee that does or did not meet, as applicable, the NYSE independence requirements for membership on those committees, our additional standards and, as to the Audit Committee, SEC rules.

In reaching the determination that Ms. Cochran is independent, the Board considered that her brother has been employed by the Company since 2009 and currently serves as Vice President of Government and Public Relations, a non-executive officer position, as described in more detail under “Transactions with Management and Others.” Ms. Cochran does not serve on the Compensation Committee which approves decisions pertaining to Mr. Brophy’s compensation, and she does not participate in his performance evaluations. Mr. Brophy’s cash compensation and equity awards are approved by the Compensation Committee pursuant to our related-party transactions approval policy.

​

​

Does the Board of Directors have a related-party transactions approval policy?

Yes. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy for the review, approval or ratification of  “related party” transactions. A “related party” for this purpose includes our directors, director nominees, executive officers and greater than 5% shareholders, and any of their immediate family members, and a “transaction” includes one in which (1) the total amount may exceed $120,000, (2) Dollar General is a participant and (3) a related party will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than as a director or a less than 10% owner of another entity, or both).

The policy requires prior Board approval for known related party transactions, subject to certain exceptions listed below. In addition, at least annually using a list of immediate family members and affiliates from our directors and executive officers, relevant internal departments determine if any transactions were unknowingly entered into with a related party, and the Board reviews a list of any such transactions, subject to the exceptions listed below. The related party may not participate in approval of the transaction and must provide to the Board all material information concerning the transaction.

Each of our Chairman and our CEO is authorized to approve a related party transaction in which he is not involved if the total anticipated amount is less than $1 million and he informs the Board of the transaction. In addition, the transactions below are deemed pre-approved without Board review or approval:

•

Transactions involving a total amount that does not exceed the greater of  $1 million or 2% of the entity’s annual consolidated revenues (total consolidated assets in the case of a lender) if no related party who is an individual participates in providing the services or goods to, or negotiations with, us on the entity’s behalf or receives special compensation or benefit as a result.

​

•

Charitable contributions if the total amount does not exceed 2% of the recipient’s total annual receipts and no related party who is an individual participates in the grant decision or receives any special compensation or benefit as a result.

​

•

Transactions where the interest arises solely from Dollar General share ownership and all of our shareholders receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis.

​

•

Transactions where the rates or charges are determined by competitive bid.

​

•

Transactions for services as a common or contract carrier or public utility at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority.

​

•

Transactions involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar services.

​

•

Compensatory transactions available on a nondiscriminatory basis to all salaried employees generally, ordinary course business travel expenses and reimbursements, or compensatory arrangements to directors, director nominees or officers or any other related party that otherwise have been approved by the Board or an authorized committee.

​

What related-party transactions existed in 2019 or are planned for 2020?

Ms. Cochran’s brother, Stephen Brophy, has been employed by the Company since 2009 and currently serves as our Vice President of Government and Public Relations, a non-executive officer position. For 2019, Mr. Brophy earned from Dollar General total cash compensation (comprised of his base salary and bonus compensation) of less than $360,000 and received an annual equity award consisting of 1,926 non-qualified stock options, 256 RSUs and 256 PSUs. In March 2020, Mr. Brophy received an annual equity award consisting of 1,783 non-qualified stock options, 190 RSUs, and 190 PSUs, in each case on terms consistent with annual equity awards received by all Dollar General employees at Mr. Brophy’s job grade level and on terms substantially similar to the forms of award agreements on file with the SEC. We expect Mr. Brophy’s total cash compensation for 2020 to not exceed $370,000. Mr. Brophy also is eligible to participate in employee benefits plans and programs available to our other full-time employees.

Ms. Cochran does not serve on the Compensation Committee which approves decisions pertaining to Mr. Brophy’s compensation, and she does not participate in his performance evaluations. Mr. Brophy’s cash compensation and equity awards are approved by the Compensation Committee pursuant to our related-party transactions approval policy.

​

​

Does the Board of Directors engage with shareholders?

Yes. Our Board of Directors values shareholder feedback and seeks to build and maintain relationships with shareholders to ensure that shareholder perspectives are incorporated into the Board decision-making process. In furtherance of this goal, we conduct year-round outreach through our senior management, investor relations and legal teams to ensure that we understand and consider issues of importance to our shareholders. We further enhanced our shareholder engagement efforts in 2019 with a focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters, inviting shareholders representing in the aggregate more than 66% of our outstanding shares to share their perspectives on these matters with our Board.

In general, shareholders that elected to participate in this ESG outreach program expressed strong support for our governance and executive compensation

practices. Shareholders also generally appreciated our efforts and initiatives on environmental and social issues, including the publication of the “Serving Others” report that details the numerous ways in which Dollar General strives to serve our customers, employees, communities, and ultimately shareholders, in responsible and sustainable ways. Feedback from these meetings was provided to our Board and informed decisions with respect to our next iteration of our “Serving Others" report and committee memberships.

These discussions also were part of the data that helped inform the Board’s decision to recommend the corporate governance proposals (proposals 4 and 5 in this proxy statement) to replace the supermajority vote requirements in our Charter and Bylaws with a majority of outstanding shares vote requirement.

​

​

​

Pay for Performance

Consistent with our philosophy, and as illustrated to the right, a significant portion of annualized total target compensation for our named executive officers in 2019 was variable/at-risk as a result of being either performance-based, linked to changes in our stock price, or both.

In addition, the following financial performance was achieved in accordance with our short-term and long-term incentive plans:

•

Teamshare Bonus Program
In connection with our 2019 Teamshare bonus program, we achieved 2019 adjusted EBIT (as defined and calculated for purposes of the Teamshare bonus program) of  $2.373 billion, or 103.89% of the adjusted EBIT target, which resulted in a 2019 Teamshare payout to each named executive officer of 138.92% of his or her target Teamshare bonus percentage opportunity (see “Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan”).

​

•

Performance Share Units
The portion of the awards granted in March 2019 subject to 2019 adjusted EBITDA performance was earned at 123.7% of target, based on achieving adjusted EBITDA of  $2.873 billion, or 102.4% of the adjusted EBITDA target, and the portion of the awards granted in March 2017 subject to 2017-2019 adjusted ROIC performance was earned at 162.0% of target based on achieving adjusted ROIC of 18.49%, or 101.7% of the adjusted ROIC three-year 2017-2019 target, in each case as defined and calculated in the PSU award agreements (see “Long-Term Equity Incentive Program”).

​

Shareholder Response

The most recent shareholder advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation was held on May 29, 2019. Excluding abstentions and broker non-votes, 95.4% of total votes were cast in support of the program. Because we view this outcome as overwhelmingly supportive of our compensation policies and practices, we do not believe the vote requires consideration of changes to the program. Nonetheless, because market practices and our business needs continue to evolve, we continually evaluate our program and make changes when warranted.

At our annual meeting of shareholders held on May 31, 2017, our shareholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year. Consistent with this preference, our Board implemented an annual advisory vote on executive compensation until the next advisory vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation, which will occur no later than our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders.

Philosophy and Objectives

We strive to attract, retain, and motivate persons with superior ability, to reward outstanding performance, and to align the long-term interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders. The material compensation principles applicable to the compensation of our named executive officers are outlined below:

•

In determining total compensation, we consider a reasonable range of the median of total compensation of comparable positions at companies within our peer group, while accounting for distinct circumstances not reflected in the market data such as unique job descriptions as well as our particular niche in the retail sector and the impact that a particular officer may have on our ability to meet business objectives. For competitive or other reasons, our levels of total compensation or any component of compensation may exceed or be below the median range of our peer group.

​

•

We set base salaries to reflect the responsibilities, experience, performance, and contributions of the

​

​

​

named executive officers and the salaries for comparable positions, while maintaining an appropriate balance between base salary and incentive compensation.

•

We reward named executive officers who enhance our performance by linking cash and equity incentives to the achievement of our financial goals.

​

•

We promote share ownership to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders.

​

•

In approving compensation arrangements, we consider recent compensation history, including special or unusual compensation payments.

​

Oversight and Process

Oversight

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, or a subcommittee thereof if required for tax or other reasons, in each case consisting entirely of independent directors, determines and approves the compensation of our named executive officers. Throughout this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the use of the term Compensation Committee (or Committee) means either the entire committee or a subcommittee thereof if required for tax or other reasons, as applicable. The independent members of our Board are provided the opportunity to ratify the Committee’s determinations pertaining to the level of CEO compensation.

Use of Outside Advisors

The Compensation Committee has selected Pearl Meyer to serve as its compensation consultant and has determined that Pearl Meyer is independent and that its work has not raised any conflicts of interest. When requested by the Committee, a Pearl Meyer representative attends Committee meetings and participates in private sessions with the Committee, and Committee members are free to consult directly with Pearl Meyer as desired.

The Committee (or its Chairperson) determines the scope of Pearl Meyer’s services and has approved a written agreement that details the terms under which Pearl Meyer will provide independent advice to the Committee. The approved scope of Pearl Meyer’s work generally includes the performance of analyses and provision of independent advice related to our executive and non-employee director compensation programs and related matters in support of the Committee’s decisions, and more specifically, includes performing preparation work associated with Committee meetings, providing advice in areas such as compensation philosophy, compensation risk assessment, peer group, incentive plan design, executive compensation disclosure, emerging best

practices and changes in the regulatory environment, and providing competitive market studies. Pearl Meyer, along with management, also prepares market data for consideration by the Committee in making decisions on items such as base salary, the Teamshare bonus program, and the long-term incentive program.

Management’s Role

Our executive management team prepares and recommends our annual financial plan to our Board of Directors for approval and establishes a 3-year financial plan. The financial performance targets used in our incentive compensation programs are the same as those in such financial plans and approved by our Compensation Committee. Our CEO and our Chief People Officer, as well as non-executive members of the human resources group, provide assistance to the Committee and Pearl Meyer regarding executive compensation matters, including conducting research, compiling data and/or making recommendations regarding compensation amount, compensation mix, incentive program structure alternatives, peer group composition, and compensation-related governance practices, as well as providing information to and coordinating with Pearl Meyer as requested. Additionally, our General Counsel may provide legal advice to the Committee regarding executive compensation and related governance and legal matters and contractual arrangements from time to time. Although these recommendations may impact each of such officers’ compensation to the extent they participate in the plans and programs, none of such officers make recommendations to the Committee regarding their specific compensation. For the role of management in named executive officers’ performance evaluations, see “Use of Performance Evaluations” below. Although the Committee values and solicits management’s input, it retains and exercises sole authority to make decisions regarding named executive officer compensation.

Use of Performance Evaluations

Each member of the Board of Directors is asked to provide feedback to the Chairman of the Board regarding the CEO’s overall performance. The Chairman of the Board shares such information with the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, together with the Chairman of the Board, then assesses the performance of the CEO, and the CEO evaluates and reports to the Committee on the performance of each of the other named executive officers, in each case versus previously established goals. The Committee also has input into each named executive officer’s performance evaluation. These evaluations are subjective; no objective criteria or relative weighting is assigned to any individual goal or factor.

​

​

Performance ratings serve as an eligibility threshold for annual base salary increases and may directly impact the amount of such increases. The Committee starts with the percentage base salary increase that equals the overall budgeted increase for our U.S.-based employee population and approves differing merit increases to base salary based upon each named executive officer’s individual performance rating. The Committee then considers whether additional adjustments are necessary to reflect performance, responsibilities or qualifications; to bring pay within a reasonable range of the peer group; due to a change in role or duties; to achieve a better balance between base salary and incentive compensation; or for other reasons the Committee believes justify a variance from the merit increase.

Performance evaluation results have the potential to affect the amount of Teamshare bonus payout because the Committee is allowed to adjust payments upward or downward depending upon the named executive officer’s individual performance or other factors.

An unsatisfactory performance rating will reduce the number of, or completely eliminate, stock options awarded to the named executive officer in the following year. In addition, individual performance and other factors, such as company and department performance, tenure, retention, and succession, are used as part of a subjective assessment to determine each named executive officer’s equity award value within a previously determined range of values.

Use of Market Data

The Compensation Committee approves, periodically reviews, and utilizes a peer group when making compensation decisions (see “Philosophy and Objectives”). The peer group data typically is considered annually for base salary adjustments, target equity award values, Teamshare target bonus opportunities, and total target compensation, and periodically when considering structural changes to our executive compensation program.

Our peer group consists of companies selected according to their similarity to our operations, services, revenues, markets, availability of information, and any other information the Committee deems appropriate. Such companies are likely to have executive positions comparable in breadth, complexity and scope of responsibility to ours. The peer group used for 2019 compensation decisions consisted of:

Pearl Meyer annually provides peer group data for the CEO, to ensure that the Committee is aware of any significant movement in CEO compensation levels within the peer group, and biennially for each named executive officer position below CEO. In alternating years, the Committee uses the prior year data for non-CEO compensation decisions after applying an aging factor recommended by Pearl Meyer. In 2019, Pearl Meyer provided peer group data for all 2019 CEO and non-CEO compensation decisions.

Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation

We provide compensation in the form of base salary, short-term cash incentives, long-term equity incentives, benefits, and limited perquisites. We believe each of these elements is a necessary component of the total compensation package and is consistent with compensation programs at companies with whom we compete both for business and talent. Decisions regarding each named executive officer’s 2019 compensation are discussed below, followed by a description of each element of compensation and the related applicable programs, as well as applicable financial performance results certified with respect to performance periods that ended in 2019.

2019 Compensation Generally

The Compensation Committee considered the annual compensation of each named executive officer in March 2019 and later determined Mr. Owen’s additional compensation upon his promotion to Chief Operating Officer in August 2019.

(a) 2019 Compensation Decisions for Mr. Vasos

In March 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the base salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive components of Mr. Vasos’s compensation, as well as his total target compensation, in each case in comparison to the peer group data (see “Use of Market Data”). After considering the peer group data, as well as Mr. Vasos’s and the Company’s fiscal 2018 performance (see “Use of Performance Evaluations”), and Mr. Vasos’s experience and tenure in the CEO role, the Committee determined to increase Mr. Vasos’s base salary to $1,300,000, effective April 1, 2019 (8.33% increase from his prior year’s base salary), and to maintain his target short-term incentive bonus percentage opportunity (150% of base salary) and his 2019 equity grant value ($8.0 million) at his 2018 levels. The Committee believed that such actions placed each component of Mr. Vasos’s 2019 compensation as well as his 2019 total target compensation within a reasonable range of the median of the peer group data. See “Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan” and “Long-Term Equity Incentive Program” for a description of such programs.

​

​

(b) 2019 Compensation Decisions for Other Named Executive Officers

In March 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the base salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive components, as well as total target compensation of the non-CEO named executive officers, in each case in comparison to the peer group data (see “Use of Market Data”), as well as each such officer’s performance (see “Use of Performance Evaluations”). The Committee made no change to any such officer’s target short-term incentive bonus percentage opportunity (in each case, 75% of base salary) from the prior year’s level, which the Committee concluded remained reasonably aligned with the peer group data. See “Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan” for a description of the bonus program.

However, beginning in 2019, the Committee incorporated the use of an equity grant value range to determine each non-CEO named executive officer’s equity grant value level, rather than using the same target value for all non-CEO named executive officer positions, to achieve better market alignment at the individual position level while continuing to allow for subjective performance differentiation and sufficiently incenting and retaining such officers. The Committee determined the equity grant value range based on the peer group data and then determined each such named executive officer’s actual grant value within the range based on a subjective assessment of a variety of factors outlined above under “Use of Performance Evaluations.” Each such named executive officer’s March 2019 equity grant values were: each of Messrs. Garratt and Reiser ($1.35 million), Mr. Owen ($1.55 million), and Ms. Taylor ($1.4 million). See “Long-Term Equity Incentive Program” for a description of the equity awards.

In addition, the Committee approved base salary merit increases in accordance with each such officer’s 2018 performance rating within the limitations of the 3% overall U.S. merit budget increase for 2019, resulting in a base salary increase of 2.82% for each non-CEO named executive officer, effective April 1, 2019. The Committee determined that each such named executive officer’s total target compensation for 2019 remained within a reasonable range of the peer group median and reflected the responsibilities of the position and the experience and contributions of the individual and thus no additional base salary adjustments were made. See “Use of Performance Evaluations.”

(c) 2019 Compensation Decisions for Mr. Owen’s Promotion to Chief Operating Officer

In August 2019, our Board created the new position of Chief Operating Officer and promoted Mr. Owen from Executive Vice President, Store Operations, to such new position. In determining Mr. Owen’s related compensation, the Compensation Committee

considered the peer group data, Mr. Owen’s existing level of compensation, prior equity awards (including the size of such awards compared to other executive officers), level of experience and qualifications, as well as the responsibilities of the position, and increased his base salary to $800,000 (19% increase from his prior 2019 base salary), increased his target short-term incentive bonus percentage opportunity from 75% to 100% of base salary (prorated for the portion of 2019 that he served as Chief Operating Officer), and awarded equity with a grant value of  $300,000 delivered in the form of stock options (consistent with the vehicle the Committee uses to deliver other employees’ promotion equity awards), all effective on August 27, 2019. The options were granted with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the grant date. These options vest 25% annually on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, subject to Mr. Owen’s continued employment with us and certain accelerated vesting provisions, and have a ten-year term. The Committee determined that Mr. Owen’s total compensation after promotion was within a reasonable range of the market median given his experience, the position and his qualifications.

Base Salary

Base salary promotes our recruiting and retention objectives by reflecting the salaries for comparable positions in the competitive marketplace, recognizing performance, and providing a stable and predictable income source for our executives. Our employment agreements set forth minimum base salary levels, which the Compensation Committee retains sole discretion to increase from time to time. The Committee routinely considers annual base salary adjustments in March.

Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan

Our short-term cash incentive plan, called Teamshare, provides an opportunity to receive a cash bonus payment equal to a certain percentage of base salary based upon Dollar General’s level of achievement of one or more pre-established financial performance targets. Accordingly, Teamshare fulfills an important part of our pay for performance philosophy while aligning the interests of our named executive officers and our shareholders.

(a) 2019 Teamshare Structure

The Compensation Committee uses adjusted EBIT as the Teamshare financial performance measure because it is a comprehensive measure of corporate performance that the Committee believes aligns with our shareholders’ interests. For purposes of the 2019 Teamshare program, adjusted EBIT is defined as our operating profit as calculated in accordance with U.S.

​

​

generally accepted accounting principles, but excludes the impact of  (a) costs, fees and expenses directly related to the consideration, negotiation, preparation, or consummation of any transaction that results in a Change in Control (within the meaning of our Stock Incentive Plan) or to any securities offering; (b) disaster-related charges; (c) gains or losses associated with our LIFO computation; and (d) unless the Committee disallows any such item, (i) any unbudgeted loss as a result of the resolution of a legal matter or (ii) any unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) related to the implementation of accounting or tax legislative changes or (iii) any unplanned loss(es) or gain(s) of a non-recurring nature, provided that in the case of each of  (i), (ii) and (iii) such amount equals or exceeds $1 million for a single loss or gain, as applicable, and $10 million in the aggregate.

The Committee set the 2019 adjusted EBIT performance goal at approximately $2.284 billion, which was the adjusted EBIT target amount in our Board-approved 2019 annual financial plan. The threshold (below which no bonus may be earned) and maximum (above which no further bonus may be earned) performance levels are 90% and 120% of the target level, respectively, as the Committee believes such levels appropriately align pay and performance and are reasonably consistent with the practices of our peer group. Payouts for financial performance are based on actual adjusted EBIT results and are interpolated on a straight-line basis between the threshold and target levels and between the target and maximum levels.

The bonus payable to each named executive officer upon achieving the target level of financial performance is equal to the officer’s applicable percentage of base salary disclosed under “2019 Compensation Generally,” unless the Committee elects to consider other factors as allowed under the program as described above under “Use of Performance Evaluations”. Payout percentages at the threshold and maximum performance levels are calculated at 50% and 300%, respectively, of the applicable target percentage of base salary.

(b) 2019 Teamshare Results

The Compensation Committee certified the adjusted EBIT performance result at $2.373 billion (103.89% of the adjusted EBIT target) which resulted in 2019 Teamshare payouts to each of the named executive officers of 138.92% of each named executive officer’s target Teamshare bonus percentage opportunity. Such amounts are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Program

Long-term equity incentives are an important part of our pay for performance philosophy and are designed to motivate named executive officers to focus on long-term success for shareholders while rewarding them for a long-term commitment to us. The Compensation Committee considers annual equity awards each March at its regular quarterly meeting and considers special equity awards as necessary in connection with one-time events such as a new hire, promotion, or special performance. Equity awards are made under our shareholder-approved Stock Incentive Plan.

(a) 2019 Annual Equity Award Structure

The Compensation Committee delivers the annual equity awards to named executive officers 50% in options and 50% in PSUs, believing that this mix appropriately incents a long-term focus while aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders.

The options are granted with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the grant date, vest 25% annually on April 1 of each of the four fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the grant is made, subject to continued employment with us and certain accelerated vesting provisions, and have a ten-year term. The PSUs can be earned if specified financial performance goals are achieved during the applicable performance periods and if certain additional vesting requirements are met as discussed more specifically below.

For PSUs the Committee selects and sets targets for financial performance measures, then establishes threshold and maximum levels of performance derived from those targets. The number of PSUs earned depends on the level of financial performance achieved versus such targets. The Committee selected adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC as the financial performance measures for the 2019 PSUs. Half of the award is subject to adjusted EBITDA performance and half of the award is subject to adjusted ROIC performance. The Committee continues to believe that these financial measures and the mix between them appropriately balance the emphasis placed upon earnings performance as well as rigorous capital management over the long-term.

For the 2019 PSU awards, a one-year performance period corresponding to our 2019 fiscal year was established for the PSUs which are subject to the adjusted EBITDA performance measure. The adjusted EBITDA performance goal of approximately $2.807 billion was the target amount set forth in our Board-approved 2019 annual financial plan. Further increasing the focus on multi-year performance as a counterbalance to short-term incentives, the PSUs

​

​

which are subject to the adjusted ROIC performance measure are subject to a three-year performance period beginning the first day of our 2019 fiscal year and extending through the last day of our 2021 fiscal year. The adjusted ROIC performance goal of 20.68% is the average of the adjusted ROIC goals for each fiscal year within the performance period as set forth in our three-year financial plan as it existed at the time the PSUs were awarded.

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles plus interest and other financing costs, net, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization, but excludes the impact of all items excluded from the 2019 Teamshare program adjusted EBIT calculation outlined above.

Adjusted ROIC for the three-year performance period is calculated as (a) the result of  (x) the sum of  (i) our operating income, plus (ii) depreciation and

amortization, plus (iii) single lease cost, minus (y) taxes, divided by (b) the result of  (x) the sum of the averages of: (i) total assets, including any assets associated with the adoption of new lease accounting standards in 2019 not otherwise reflected in our balance sheet, plus (ii) accumulated depreciation and amortization, minus (y) (i) cash, minus (ii) goodwill, minus (iii) accounts payable, minus (iv) other payables, minus (v) accrued liabilities, but excludes the impact of all items excluded from the 2019 Teamshare program adjusted EBIT calculation outlined above.

The following tables show the amount (as a percent of target) of such PSUs that could be earned at each of the threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for each applicable performance period, as well as the 2019 adjusted EBITDA performance result and the number of PSUs earned by each named executive officer as a result of such performance.

The PSUs earned by each named executive officer for fiscal 2019 adjusted EBITDA performance will vest in equal one-third installments on April 1, 2020, April 1, 2021, and April 1, 2022, subject to such officer’s continued employment with us and certain accelerated vesting provisions. Subject to certain pro-rata vesting conditions, the PSUs earned, if any, by each named

executive officer for adjusted ROIC performance during the three-year performance period will vest on April 1, 2022, subject to such officer’s continued employment with us and certain accelerated vesting provisions. All vested PSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock.

​

​

(b) 2017 PSU Awards – Completed 2017-2019 Performance Period

Certain of the PSUs awarded in 2017 were subject to an adjusted ROIC performance measure for a three-year performance period beginning on the first day of our 2017 fiscal year and extending through the last day of our 2019 fiscal year, based on the average adjusted ROIC for each fiscal year within the three-year period. The average adjusted ROIC was derived from our three-year financial plan in place at the time of the award and is calculated as (a) the result of  (x) the sum of  (i) our operating income, plus (ii) depreciation and amortization, plus (iii) minimum rentals for 2017 and 2018 and single lease cost for 2019, minus (y) taxes, divided by (b) the result of  (x) the sum of the averages of: (i) total assets, excluding any assets associated with the adoption of new lease accounting standards in 2019, plus (ii) accumulated depreciation and amortization, minus (y) (i) cash, minus (ii) goodwill, minus (iii) accounts payable, minus (iv) other payables, minus (v) accrued liabilities, plus (vi) 8x minimum rentals for 2017 and 2018 and 8x single lease cost for 2019 (with all of the foregoing terms as determined per our financial statements for each fiscal year), but excluding the impact of  (a) any costs, fees and expenses directly related to the consideration, negotiation, preparation or consummation of any

transaction that results in a change in control (within the meaning of our Stock Incentive Plan) or any security offering; (b) disaster-related charges; (c) any gains or losses associated with our LIFO computation; (d) in 2019, impacts related to lease accounting rules; and (e) unless the Compensation Committee disallows any such item, (i) any unbudgeted loss as a result of the resolution of a legal matter or (ii) any unplanned loss(es), net of related unplanned gains, of a non-recurring nature, provided that in the case of each of  (i) and (ii) such amount equals or exceeds $1 million for a single loss or net loss, as applicable, and $10 million in the aggregate.

The following tables show the amount (as a percent of target) of such PSUs that could be earned at each of the applicable threshold, target and maximum performance levels, as well as the actual performance result and the number of such PSUs earned by each named executive officer who received a 2017 PSU award. When calculating the performance result, the Committee exercised negative discretion to adjust ROIC for the material positive impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act driven by both the benefit associated with the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities in 2017 and for the ongoing federal corporate tax rate reduction in 2017, 2018 and 2019.

​

Each senior officer is required to retain ownership of 50% of all net after-tax shares issuable upon vesting or exercise of compensatory awards until the target ownership level is achieved. As of January 31, 2020, each of our named executive officers was in compliance with our share ownership and holding requirement policy either because he or she met the guideline or was within the allotted grace period.

(d) Hedging and Pledging Policies

Our policy prohibits Board members, executive officers, and their Controlled Persons from (1) pledging Dollar General securities as collateral, (2) holding Dollar General securities in a margin account, and (3) hedging against any decrease in the market value of equity securities awarded by Dollar General and held by them, such as entering into or trading prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, puts, calls, options, exchange funds (also known as swap funds) or other derivative instruments related to Dollar General equity securities. All other employees, as well as their Controlled Persons are strongly discouraged from entering into these types of transactions. Controlled Persons include the Board member’s, executive officer’s or employee’s respective spouses, immediate family members sharing their home or that are economically dependent on them, entities that they control, and trusts in which they serve as a trustee or are a beneficiary.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our named executive officers participate in certain benefits on the same terms that are offered to all of our salaried employees. We also provide them with limited additional benefits and perquisites for retention and recruiting purposes, to replace benefit opportunities lost due to regulatory limits, and to enhance their ability to focus on our business. We do not provide tax gross-up payments for named executive officers on any benefits and perquisites other than relocation-related items. The primary additional benefits and perquisites include the following:

•

We provide a compensation deferral plan (the “CDP”) and, for named executive officers hired or promoted

​

prior to May 28, 2008, a defined contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP,” and together with the CDP, the “CDP/SERP Plan”) as discussed in more detail under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal 2019”.

•

We pay the premiums for a life insurance benefit equal to 2.5 times base salary up to a maximum of $4 million.

​

•

We provide a salary continuation program that provides income replacement for up to 26 weeks at 100% of base salary for the first three weeks and 70% of base salary thereafter. In addition to the income replacement benefit, we pay administrative fees associated with the program. We also pay the premiums under a group long-term disability plan that provides 60% of base salary up to a maximum monthly benefit of  $20,000.

​

•

We provide a relocation assistance program under a policy applicable to officer-level employees.

​

•

We provide personal financial and estate planning and tax preparation services through a third party.

​

Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements

We have an employment agreement with each of our named executive officers, each of which has a three-year term and is subject to certain automatic extensions. These agreements promote executive continuity, aid in retention, and, in return for granting such executives certain severance and other rights upon a termination of employment, secure valuable protections for Dollar General, such as non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality obligations, and facilitate implementation of our clawback policy.

We believe that reasonable severance benefits are appropriate to protect the named executive officer against circumstances over which he or she does not have control and as consideration for the promises of non-disclosure, non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-interference, as well as the clawback rights that we require in our employment agreements. A change in control, by itself  (“single trigger”), does not trigger any severance provision applicable to our named executive

​

​

officers, except for the provisions related to outstanding equity awards granted prior to 2016. Equity awards granted in or after 2016 do not provide for single trigger vesting acceleration but rather require both a termination event and a change in control to accelerate vesting of such equity awards.

Considerations Associated with Regulatory Requirements

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, we generally may not take a tax deduction for individual compensation over $1 million paid in any taxable year to each of the persons that meet the definition of a covered employee under Section 162(m). For fiscal 2019, covered employees include anyone who was a covered employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, anyone who held the position of CEO or Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) at any time during the fiscal year and the three most highly compensated employees who acted as executive officers (other than as CEO or CFO) at any time during the fiscal year. Prior to U.S. tax law changes in 2017, certain performance-based compensation was exempt from the Section 162(m) deduction limit. However, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the performance-based compensation exemption was eliminated unless the compensation qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

The Compensation Committee continues to view the tax deductibility of executive compensation as one of many factors to be considered in the context of its

overall compensation philosophy and therefore reserves the right to approve compensation that may not be deductible in situations it deems appropriate.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this document.

This report has been furnished by the members of the Compensation Committee:

•

Patricia D. Fili-Krushel, Chairperson

​

•

Warren F. Bryant

​

•

Timothy I. McGuire

​

The above Compensation Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Dollar General filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Dollar General specifically incorporates this report by reference therein.

​

​

​

​